Showing posts with label Turner Prize. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Turner Prize. Show all posts

Review: The Turner Prize Ceremony (Oddest Year Yet?)



Susan Philipsz: Sonic boom


Susan Philipsz has won the Turner prize – using just her own voice. So was her night marred by the student protests? How did she get into sound art? And what's this about a run-in with Stephen Fry?


Susan Philipsz



Monday's Turner prize ceremony was the oddest – and in some ways the most moving – that most regular guests of the annual event can remember. Students and lecturers from London art colleges staged a "teach-in" protest during the day in Tate Britain, where the award was due to be announced in the evening. At closing time, many refused to leave, remaining in the entrance hall.

Later, at the event itself, only a makeshift barrier separated the student protesters from the party-goers in the central gallery of the museum. The students – demonstrating against cuts in public funding to higher education for arts, humanities and social sciences – were invisible but audible, and the talk inside the party, where guests included culture minister Ed Vaizey, was of little else. Many at the party had attended art schools or taught in them, and, despite a certain discomfort induced by their sipping champagne while the young protesters continued with their demonstration just metres away, approved of the protest.

Anjalika Sagar – half of the Otolith Group collective, which was shortlisted for the prize – went outside to give a speech of solidarity to the students and returned clutching a crumpled banner. Nicholas Serota, director of the Tate, also spoke to them sympathetically. And the winner of the £25,000 prize – Glaswegian Susan Philipsz, whose piece consisted of a recording of her soft and sonorous voice singing a traditional Scottish lament over the River Clyde – remembered it the morning after just as an artist who works in sound ought: "It was a surreal experience. The particular acoustics in the gallery made it seem like it was a dream – the way the cheering and the chanting carried."

Some artists might have felt a little irritated by their moment of glory being so noisily hijacked, but Philipsz is a veteran of the barricades. In her acceptance speech, she expressed her sympathies – even if, in the heat of the moment, she blurted out that "education is a privilege not a right", which might well be taken as a prophecy. When we meet at Tate Britain the following morning, she corrects herself. "Education is a right not a privilege – as I used to say myself on demos."

In fact, before Philipsz went to art school at the age of 23, she devoted herself to political activism in her hometown. She had always wanted to be an artist, but reckoned her time could be more usefully channelled into promoting political causes. This was in the mid-1980s; she is 45 now. "We campaigned against the poll tax. And the miners' strike. We used to collect money outside shopping centres – 'Dig deep for the miners'; 'Maggie, Maggie, Maggie, out, out, out.' I thought of doing politics more seriously. I passionately believed we could change the world – that there could be socialism in our time. Those were heady, idealistic days."

So what happened? Where did the idealism go? "I know my works aren't overtly political, but . . . " She hesitates. "But I did use the Internationale in a work." Remarkably, given the fact that she has had three hours' sleep, she starts to sing, in that sweet voice . . .

Arise, ye workers from your slumber,

Arise, ye prisoners of want.

For reason in revolt now thunders,

And at last ends the age of cant!

She made the work in 1999: a recording of her voice, singing this anthem of international socialism, was installed in an underpass in Ljubljana, Slovenia. "When I hear a big group singing that song," says Philipsz, "it makes me want to cry. But with my solo voice it was ambiguous. It was unclear whether it was a clarion call to action, or a lament for the past." She says she remembers an old lady, tears streaming down her face, singing along in what may have been Slovenian or Russian.

In the end, what got her to art school was her sister Barbara, one of five siblings. (Four of them made it to the event to celebrate. Mum and dad stayed at home: "Mum was dancing in front of the telly.") Back then, Barbara was attending Bellarmine Arts Centre in Glasgow, building up a portfolio to get her into art college. So Philipsz joined the class, too. Barbara then got in to Glasgow School of Art, and Philipsz didn't. Instead, she was offered a place at Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art, part of Dundee University.

There, Philipsz took part in student protests against cuts to grants, and reminisces about an occupation of the university. "We had all slept in the library and, at the crack of dawn, we were put into pairs and designated our own room." She and a fellow student were put into "what looked like the nerve centre of the university" – a cupboard-size room humming with giant computers.

After an altercation in which "someone tried to shoulder the door", there came a polite knock. Could the university's rector have a word? They said yes. "And in walks Stephen Fry. He looked like a giant. He had a really deep tan as if he'd been helicoptered in from his holiday. He said, 'Look here, I am sympathetic to your cause, but do you really think this is the right way of addressing it?'" Fry was sent off with a flea in his ear by Philipsz's fellow protester.

Later, she studied as a postgraduate in Belfast. So, though she  is Glaswegian, her background is different from that of so many artists who, graduates of the city's art school, have ended up as nominees for or winners of the Turner prize, including Richard Wright (last year), Simon Starling (2005), and Douglas Gordon (1996). "I think it was a good thing I left," she says. "Though it's so hard to tell. It's been a different route from a lot of my peers."

The work that clinched the prize was the installation Lowlands Away, under three bridges of the Clyde in Glasgow, made for the art festival Glasgow International. In fact, she has had relatively little work shown in her hometown, and mourns the fact that Lowlands Away ran for just two weeks – and, during that time, aircraft were grounded by the Icelandic ash cloud, so many potential visitors were prevented from coming to the festival from overseas.

Soft voice on a brutalist walkway

It was the period in Belfast, she says, that really formed her as an artist and saw her gravitating, as a sculpture student, towards sound, in particular recordings of her own voice. "I had always liked singing, and I started thinking about the physicality of singing – becoming aware of the space created by the voice in the body, and how it projects into the space around you." The fact that her voice is untrained is part of the power of her work – there is a fragility, a humanity and a sheer ordinariness to her voice that draws the listener in, adding an emotional depth to the otherwise formal intent of her work, which is about the way that sound can fill, explain and animate a space.

A six-part piece, Surround Me, commissioned by Artangel, can currently be experienced in various locations around the City of London: walkers happen upon the melancholy sounds of 16th- and 17th-century English madrigals and rounds as they wander past London Bridge, the Bank of England and the strange brutalist walkways of the financial district.

Philipsz has, for the last nine years, lived in Berlin with her partner Eoghan McTigue; it's a city that's home to so many British artists, including Gordon, Ceal Floyer, and former Turner prize nominees Tacita Dean and Phil Collins. She plans to host a Burns night this year, with homemade haggis (she honed her technique last year by stuffing enough offal into a pig's stomach to feed 30 people, brave woman).

She has no plans to come home, though she can sound wistful about Scotland and London. But then a hint of wistfulness seems to flow through both Philipsz and her work. "I sometimes miss – Eoghan would laugh at me, he doesn't think I can change a lightbulb – I sometimes miss the physicality of making things," she says.

But, as Serota said at the prize ceremony, with an ironic nod in the direction of the chants of the demonstrators, now seems to be all about sound.

 

This article is from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/dec/07/susan-philipsz-turner-prize

Susan Philipsz Winning the Turner Prize Is 'The Right Result'


Turner Prize winner Susan Philipsz: an expert view


Susan Philipsz' work makes you think about place, space, memory and presence: it opens up your feelings


Susan Philipsz

Susan Philipsz winning the Turner prize is the right result, and I feel the same pleasure in her win as I did when painter Tomma Abts won in 2006. In both cases I was impressed by the artists' originality - not a word you hear much in contemporary art circles, their inventiveness, and the difficult yet accessible pleasures their art can give.

Dexter Dalwood's paintings seemed to me too brittle, too clever and contrived to win. He was let down by having too many works in the show, too few of which were in themselves compelling. Each painting was a compendium of styles and references, and it all felt a bit too dutiful and congested. I much prefer Angela de la Cruz's work, with its painful humour, honesty and knockabout abjection. But De la Cruz's work seems to me to be at a moment of transition. Having only recently returned to work following a debilitating stroke, her ensemble of recent and older paintings and sculptures was as much a statement of intent as a fully achieved exhibition. Last month, de la Cruz won a coveted £35,000 Paul Hamlyn award. This is as valuable and prestigious as winning the Turner Prize.

Like De la Cruz, the wider exposure of the art of the Otolith Group collective has been valuable. It is as though Kodwo Eshun and Anjalika Sagar wanted to make life as hard on the audience as possible. I took a perverse delight in the fact that they made us work at their art, which is as erudite as it is sensual, as sexy as it is filmic. But they have an almost academic streak that makes one think one is in a classroom or study centre.

Philipsz is the first artist working with sound to have won the prize. I can imagine people saying she is just a singer, with the sort of voice you might feel lucky to come across at a folk club. But there is much more to Philipsz than a good voice. All singers, of course, are aware of the space their voice occupies, of the difference between one hall and another. We know it ourselves, singing in the shower. But the way Philipsz sites recordings of her voice is as much to do with place as sound. She has haunted the Clyde and filled her box-like Turner installation with the ballad Lowlands; she has called across a lake in Germany and had her voice swept away by the wind on a Folkestone headland.

Her current Artangel project, Surround Me, insinuates itself down alleys and courtyards in the City of London, her voice like an Elizabethan ghost, singing melancholy works by John Dowland and other 16th and 17th century composers. I have stood in shadowy old courtyards and between gleaming office blocks, weeping as I listen. And how many artists can you say that about?

Her sense of place, and space, memory and presence reminds me, weirdly, of the sculptor Richard Serra at his best. Her art makes you think of your place in the world, and opens you up to your feelings.

This article is from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/dec/06/turner-prize-susan-philipz

Phililips Collection To Reopen After Fire



[caption id="" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Image via Wikipedia"]Luncheon of the Boating Party (1881) by Pierre...[/caption]


Phillips Collection to reopen, launch a mobile application


The Phillips Collection has set the date for the official reopening of the original house, which has been closed since a disastrous fire in September.

All the work will be finished by Jan. 15, the museum announced, and a celebration will begin that day to welcome back the famed paintings. The art was not harmed in the Sept. 2 fire, which was restricted to the roof and the suite of offices right under the roof. But there was extensive water damage to 12 galleries in the 1897 building.

Certainly the re-opening is the prime reason to mark the 90th anniversary of the popular gallery.

However, the staff is planning much more and is promoting all activities under the banner "90 Years of New."

The Phillips will be free Jan. 15 and 16 during the kickoff. Specialty birthday cakes will be displayed. All are being created by local chefs from Restaurant Eve's Rebekka Baltzell to Blue Duck Tavern's Peter Brett to Cake Love's Warren Brown. The public will vote for the best by placing a $1 in front of the confectionery, the tally indicating the winner and the money going to the museum's education programs.

If this wasn't sweet enough, the Phillips is also introducing a guide in how to do the museum in 90 minutes and a "relay tour" of how to look at 90 works of art with 10 minutes of study in front of each.

New last week is the museum's official mobile phone application. That would turn Renoir's head and, of course, the Phillips's prize possession of "Luncheon of the Boating Party" is featured on a screen. After a free download to iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, nearly 3,000 works of art can be viewed, as well as browsing audio guides, podcasts and videos.

When the historic mansion re-opens there will be a special installation of Sir Howard Hodgkin's "As Time Goes by," completed in 2009 and consisting of two 20 foot long etchings. Hodgkin, a holder of the coveted Turner Prize, had his first U.S. exhibition at the Phillips in 1984.

- Jacqueline Trescott

This article is from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/03/AR2010120305683.html?wprss=rss_print/style

What's Wrong With Tate Britain


Tate Britain's rehang is a terrible idea


By relegating most of its pre-20th century art to the storerooms, the gallery shows a scandalous lack of regard for national treasures – and British history


20th century boxed ... Tate Britain's most recent rehang.

Tate Britain has been suffering an identity crisis for a decade, and is embarking on yet another round of therapy. The latest rehang of the collection is being billed as the beginning of an entirely new approach, scheduled to culminate in 2013 when a building programme gives it expanded gallery space and the entire collection will be displayed in chronological order. Yet if that sounds like a cure, the immediate arrangement pulls the patient to the very brink of catastrophe.

Like those of some hapless royal in search of a "role", Tate Britain's troubles over what exactly it's for boil down to the quarrel of ancients and moderns. Does this British part of the Tate empire exist to celebrate and display the history of British art since the Renaissance, or is it just a showcase for contemporary British art? The new displays lurch towards the latter, but in a dull way that drags the original young artists of the 90s into an establishment history of British modernism – when in fact they deserve to be seen with British greats like Hogarth and Turner.

Surely I can't be the only visitor who, entering a museum billed online as "the home of British art from 1500 to the present day", expects to see just that: a rich array of British art from Rubens' oil sketch for the Banqueting House ceiling – saved for the Tate Collection after a public appeal in 2008 – to the latest young artists.

Yet room after room of the new display reveals more and more British 20th-century art – the good, the bad and the indifferent. Last time I checked we were in the 21st century, and it makes no more sense to insist on the relevance of the period 1900-2000 than to dedicate the entire museum to, say, the 16th century. Though it seems there's fat chance of the latter. The Tate press office insists that a third of the art on display is still pre-1900, but most of such older works as are visible will be crammed into one big room of "iconic" paintings or shoved into the Clore gallery, which is supposed to be dedicated to Turner. Using the press office's own figures, that means four-fifths of the collection (ie, 1500-1900) gets just a third of the space.

Even if the new displays are the aperitif to a great new museum in 2013, it is simply wrong to put so many works of deep historical and often aesthetic interest into storage for three years, or two years, or one year. There are plenty of iconoclasts in the wings asking why public collections don't sell off a few old paintings, and frankly this lack of regard for national treasures gives them credence.

Are we all supposed to simply forget British history for the next couple of years? If I were a teacher, I'd take my class to the V&A instead, where the past, present and future all flourish, as they should in any museum worthy of the name.

 

This article is from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2010/dec/01/tate-britain-rehang-revamp